Courtland Sykes, who aspires to the United States Senate, also said that he wants his wife to have dinner ready when he gets home.
A Republican candidate for the United States Senate today caused controversy after making public statements in which, when asked about women's rights, explained that what he wants is that when he gets home, dinner is ready. (Video: The excuses that machismo was invented to violate women)
"I want to get to a house where there's a homemade dinner at six every night," said conservative Courtland Sykes, who will seek to be a Republican senator from Missouri, in an interview he posted on his Facebook page. (The Matched: The men who do not know that they hate women)
Sykes, 37, had been asked if he was in favor of women's rights , to which he replied that his fiancée had given him "orders" to be "favorable" to them, but that his "obedience" entailed a "small price": that when he arrives home, the plate is on the table.
The Republican also stressed that he hopes that "one day" his daughters will become "housewives and traditional family women".
"I do not buy the crazy definitions of radical feminism about being a modern woman and I never did," continued the one who aspires to take a seat in the Upper House this year.
Likewise, the conservative candidate pointed out that feminists "invented" the concept "to adapt it to their filthy and snake-filled minds".
Sykes expressed that she does not accept the "relentless feminization of the campaign against men," and argued that men and women are different, something that will not change "a nest of academic fools of a drug store, except in the life of fantasy of those confused people in Wonderland. "
Regarding her daughters, the candidate emphasized that she does not want them to be "hell-feminists" who believe that they can " jump high buildings at one time" so that "men do not suppress them", and said that feminism is "just one madness".
To close his argument, Sykes explained that he supports the rights of women, but not those who "have oppressed the natural way of being a woman for five decades."
The comments generated controversy in social networks, where the political analyst Charlie Sykes criticized the claims of the applicant: "To be clear: we have no relationship at all, thank God," he said in relation to the coincidence of surnames.
The columnist John Podhoretz, who referred to the Republican as an "unnameable imbecile" and wished him "good luck in his endeavor" in a clearly ironic way, also spoke about it.
No comments:
Post a Comment